James shares two other important important concepts. First is the notion that memories are tied together as multiple systems in the brain.
"We have, then, not so much a faculty of memory as many faculties of memory. We have as many as we have systems of objects habitually thought of in connection with each other. A given object is held in the memory by the associates it has acquired within its own system exclusively. Learning the facts of another system will in no wise help it to stay in the mind, for the simple reason that it has no 'cues' within that other system" (p. 62 ).James relates to us that not every person is a master of every faculty. For example, some individuals are better at math and science reasoning, while others possess a facility for recalling historical dates. Toward that end, he introduces the concept of the mnemonic devices for facilitating ways of thinking. However, he admits that this can become a tedious exercise which subverts what to me the main point of this talk; Rote memorization is not the best way by which to evaluate a student. Students have individual strengths and weaknesses. It is a more effective strategy to build upon prior knowledge and to consider the level of discourse at which a student may participate in a given area relative to their strengths in other subjects.
This fits in perfectly with what Sweller (1988) says about instructional activities relative to the stated objectives of learning. When teachers have students perform tasks far removed from the desired learning goal, it unduly taxes the brain. To marry the concepts of these two works, it seems that the establishment of direct associations that might be universally understood will best help students internalize and retain information.
Can you recall an instance in which a teacher presented information which made a lasting impression on you?
References
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science,
12, 257-285.
I get the sense that you've had LOTS of classes on learning. I'm starting to understand the "About Me" section of your blog. :)
ReplyDeleteThank you. I have taken 15 hours in education, but I think I have applied myself. I am also very interested in Skinner and Sweller and I read one very interesting piece on Dweck that I look forward to hearing about/sharing with the class. Last semester's six hours were the most grueling I have ever taken, but I learned so much. Moreover, I have dozens of really great co-workers and faculty at EKU who have supported me and let me further my understanding of what I have learn through on the job experiences, discussions and really treating me as a peer.
ReplyDelete