Consider this passage:
"The first thing, then, for the teacher to understand is the native reactive tendencies,—the impulses and instincts of childhood,—so as to be able to substitute one for another, and turn them on to artificial objects" (p. 22).James is chiefly implying is that in order to understand pedagogy, we need to understand the mind of the child, how it functions in relation to the various stages of development and what characteristics and constrains we might need to understand in order to effectively present instruction (Major, 1906).
How would you apply this information to adult learners within a training setting where one might have diverse experiences and attitudes about a given subject?
References
Major, D. R. (1906). First steps in mental growth: a series of studies in the psychology of infancy Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?id=ttsjAAAAMAAJ&dq=rst%20steps%20in%20mental%20growth%3A%20a%20series%20of%20studies%20in%20the%20psychology%20of%20infancy&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=false
But why did James think it important for teachers to understand that reactions both native and acquired? What does this have to do with learning? What is the theory of learning that James it putting forth? Again, more questions to be sure you can answer here.
ReplyDelete